The doctrine of the Trinity is one of the foundational beliefs of Christianity, affirming that God exists as three persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—yet is one in essence. However, misconceptions abound regarding its origins, particularly concerning the role of the Council of Nicaea (A.D. 325), Emperor Constantine, and the Arian controversy. Some claim the Trinity was invented at Nicaea or imposed by Constantine, but history tells a different story.

Watch the conversation between Mike Winger and Wes Huff.

--

The Unveiling Mormonism podcast pulls back the curtain on Mormon history, culture and doctrine. Join us for new episodes every Monday.

Find resources to talk about these episodes at pursueGOD.org/mormonism.

Help others go "full circle" as a follower of Jesus through our 12-week Pursuit series.

Click here to learn more about how to use these resources at home, with a small group, or in a one-on-one discipleship relationship.

Got questions or want to leave a note? Email us at podcast@pursueGOD.org.

Donate Now

--

The doctrine of the Trinity is one of the foundational beliefs of Christianity, affirming that God exists as three persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—yet is one in essence. However, misconceptions abound regarding its origins, particularly concerning the role of the Council of Nicaea (A.D. 325), Emperor Constantine, and the Arian controversy. Some claim the Trinity was invented at Nicaea or imposed by Constantine, but history tells a different story.

1. Was the Trinity Invented at Nicaea?

A common myth is that the doctrine of the Trinity was created at the Council of Nicaea. In reality, the core concept of God’s triune nature existed long before the fourth century. The early church fathers, including Tertullian (A.D. 160–225) and Origen (A.D. 185–253), wrote extensively about the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as distinct persons sharing one divine essence. The Council of Nicaea did not introduce the idea but clarified it in response to the Arian controversy.

2. The Arian Controversy: Was Jesus a Created Being?

Arius, a presbyter from Alexandria, taught that Jesus was not eternally God but a created being who was exalted above all creation. This view directly contradicted Scripture, which presents Jesus as fully divine (John 1:1, Colossians 2:9, Hebrews 1:3). Arianism gained traction, prompting a theological crisis that led Emperor Constantine to convene the Council of Nicaea. The council decisively rejected Arianism, affirming that Christ is "of the same essence" (homoousios) as the Father. This was not a new doctrine but a reaffirmation of what the church had always believed.

3. Did Constantine Impose the Trinity?

Another misconception is that Emperor Constantine imposed the doctrine of the Trinity for political reasons. While Constantine did call the council to promote unity in the empire, he did not dictate its theological outcome. He initially leaned toward Arian sympathies but ultimately accepted the Nicene Creed, which was formulated by church leaders based on Scripture, not imperial decree. The council’s decision reflected the consensus of bishops from across the Christian world, not a political mandate.

4. The Trinity: A Biblical Doctrine, Not a Man-Made One

Despite arguments that the Trinity is a later theological development, the doctrine is firmly rooted in Scripture. Passages such as Matthew 28:19 (“baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit”) and 2 Corinthians 13:14 (“The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all”) clearly present a triune understanding of God. The doctrine of the Trinity is not an invention of the church but a faithful reflection of biblical revelation.

Mormon Beliefs About the Trinity

Mormons (members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or LDS Church) reject the traditional Christian doctrine of the Trinity as formulated in the Nicene Creed (AD 325). Instead, they believe in the Godhead as three distinct, separate beings: God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and the Holy Ghost, who are "one" in purpose rather than being one in substance.

Latter-day Saints reject the idea that God is of one essence or being (homoousios) as defined in the Nicene Creed. Instead, they believe:

• God the Father and Jesus Christ are two separate, corporeal beings with glorified bodies of flesh and bone.
• The Holy Ghost is a separate personage of spirit.
• They are perfectly united in will, purpose, and power, but not in physical being.

Joseph Smith, the founder of the LDS Church, emphasized the distinctness of the Father and the Son in his First Vision account, where he claimed to have seen both of them as separate beings:

“I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other—‘This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!’”

(Joseph Smith—History 1:17, Pearl of Great Price)

LDS Apostle Jeffrey R. Holland reinforced this belief:

"We believe these divine persons are three distinct beings, but they are one in purpose, in love, and in desire to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of all mankind."

(Jeffrey R. Holland, General Conference, October 2007)

Mormon Views on the Council of Nicaea

The LDS Church generally views the Council of Nicaea (AD 325) as a departure from original Christian teachings. Mormons believe that after the deaths of the original apostles, doctrinal corruption entered Christianity, which they call the Great Apostasy.

Joseph Smith spoke critically of creeds, including Nicene Christianity:

“I cannot believe in any of the creeds of the different denominations, because they all have some things in them I cannot subscribe to. Though all have a little truth, all are wrong, when taken in their entirety.”

(Joseph Smith, quoted in Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 327)

A modern LDS leader, Bruce R. McConkie, called the Nicene Creed a philosophical distortion:

“The Creeds of Christendom codify what Jeremiah calls ‘the lies’ which ‘have inherited’ from past ages. They say that the Father is unknowable, incomprehensible, and without body, parts, or passions. This is false.”

(Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 269)

LDS scholar James E. Talmage also criticized the Nicene formulation:

“The establishment of the Church of Christ upon the earth was followed by a widespread apostasy. The simplicity of the Gospel was corrupted, and unauthorized changes were made in its structure.”

(James E. Talmage, The Great Apostasy, 1909, p. 79)

Mormons reject the traditional doctrine of the Trinity in favor of a belief in a distinct, embodied Father and Son, with the Holy Ghost as a separate spirit being. They view the Council of Nicaea as part of an apostate deviation from early Christianity, replacing simple, biblical truths with Greek philosophical constructs.

Takeaway

The Trinity is not a man-made doctrine imposed at Nicaea but a biblical truth affirmed throughout church history. The Council of Nicaea addressed the Arian controversy by defending what Christians had always believed: that Jesus Christ is fully God. Constantine did not create or enforce the Trinity; rather, the church, guided by Scripture and the Holy Spirit, defended it against heresy. Understanding these historical realities helps believers stand firm in the truth and proclaim the gospel with clarity and conviction.

The Edict of Toleration and the Council of Nicaea are connected through the broader historical context of the legalization and eventual promotion of Christianity in the Roman Empire during the early 4th century.

1. The Edicts of Toleration and Legalization of Christianity

Before the Council of Nicaea (AD 325), Christianity had suffered periods of persecution under the Roman Empire. However, this changed through a series of imperial decrees known as Edicts of Toleration, which granted legal status to Christianity:

• Edict of Toleration (AD 311) – Issued by Emperor Galerius, this decree officially ended the Diocletianic Persecution (303–311) and allowed Christians to practice their faith, though with restrictions. Galerius, once a fierce persecutor, acknowledged that his efforts to suppress Christianity had failed, stating:
• 
  
• 
  
• “Wherefore, for this our indulgence, they ought to pray to their God for our safety, for that of the republic, and for their own.”
• (Lactantius, On the Deaths of the Persecutors, 34)
• 
  
• 
  
• Edict of Milan (AD 313) – Issued by Constantine the Great (Western Roman Emperor) and Licinius (Eastern Roman Emperor), this decree expanded religious freedom, granting full legal rights to Christians and restoring confiscated property. It declared:
• 
  
• 
  
• “We have resolved to grant to both the Christians and to all others full authority to follow whatever worship each man has desired.”
• (Lactantius, On the Deaths of the Persecutors, 48)
• 
  

2. Connection to the Council of Nicaea (AD 325)

The Edict of Milan set the stage for the Council of Nicaea by legalizing Christianity and giving it imperial favor. This had several important consequences:

1. Christianity Became an Imperial Concern – With Christianity now legally protected, internal theological disputes (such as the Arian controversy) became an issue of state unity. Constantine sought to unify Christian doctrine to maintain stability in the empire.
2. 
   
3. Constantine’s Role in Christian Affairs – Though not yet baptized, Constantine saw Christianity as a tool for unifying the empire. He convened the Council of Nicaea in AD 325 to settle the dispute over Arianism (the belief that Jesus was not of the same essence as the Father).
4. 
   
5. Shift from Persecuted Sect to Imperial Religion – Before the edicts of toleration, Christians faced martyrdom for their faith. After Nicaea, Christianity moved toward becoming the dominant state religion, culminating in Emperor Theodosius I’s Edict of Thessalonica (AD 380), which made Nicene Christianity the official faith of the Roman Empire.
6. 
   

Conclusion

The Edict of Toleration (311) and the Edict of Milan (313) paved the way for Christianity’s legal acceptance, leading directly to the Council of Nicaea (325). The council, convened by Constantine, sought to resolve theological disputes within a now imperially recognized and favored Christian Church, marking the transition from a persecuted minority faith to a religion closely tied to imperial authority.

The word "Trinity" (Latin: Trinitas) was not used at the Council of Nicaea (AD 325). While the council affirmed the divinity of Jesus Christ and his oneness in essence (homoousios) with the Father, the formal doctrine of the Trinity as later articulated was still developing.

What Nicaea Did Define

The primary purpose of the Council of Nicaea was to address the Arian controversy, which questioned whether Jesus was divine in the same way as God the Father. The council produced the Nicene Creed, which affirmed:

• Jesus Christ is "of one substance" (homoousios) with the Father.
• He was "begotten, not made," countering Arius' teaching that Christ was a created being.

However, the full Trinitarian doctrine—which includes the co-equality and co-eternality of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—was not fully articulated until the Council of Constantinople (AD 381), which expanded the Nicene Creed and explicitly included the Holy Spirit.

Development of the Word "Trinity"

The Council of Constantinople (AD 381) is the council that formally established the doctrine of the Trinity as understood in mainstream Christianity.

Key Contributions of the Council of Constantinople (381):

1. Expanded the Nicene Creed – The council reaffirmed and expanded the Nicene Creed (325) to include a more detailed statement on the Holy Spirit, confirming His divinity and personhood. This later version is often called the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed.
2. Declared the Holy Spirit as Fully Divine – While Nicaea (325) focused on the Son's divinity (homoousios – "of the same essence" as the Father), Constantinople affirmed that the Holy Spirit is also fully God, proceeding from the Father.
3. Condemned Various Heresies – The council rejected:

• Arianism, which denied Christ’s full divinity.
• Macedonianism (Pneumatomachianism), which denied the Holy Spirit's divinity.

1. Completed the Trinitarian Formula – While the term "Trinity" was used earlier (e.g., by Tertullian in the 2nd century), the Council of Constantinople formally established the doctrine that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are co-equal, co-eternal, and of the same divine essence (homoousios).

The Final Form of the Trinitarian Doctrine

The Council of Constantinople solidified the Trinitarian formula still used in Christian theology today:

One God in three persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit, all distinct but fully divine and of the same essence.

This doctrine was reaffirmed in later councils, including:

• The Council of Ephesus (431) – affirmed Christ as fully God and fully man in one person.
• The Council of Chalcedon (451) – defined the two natures of Christ (divine and human).
• The Second Council of Constantinople (553) – further clarified Trinitarian theology.

Conclusion

While the Council of Nicaea (325) established Christ’s divinity, the Council of Constantinople (381) formally established the doctrine of the Trinity, defining the Holy Spirit as divine and confirming the Trinitarian view that remains central to Christian orthodoxy today.