Artwork for podcast Leaders with impact
(E18) Why leaders struggle with annual planning
Episode 1829th April 2024 • Leaders with impact • Lee Griffith
00:00:00 00:16:11

Share Episode

Shownotes

In this episode I’m exploring the challenges organisations can face when leaders can’t align personal and organisational priorities. I share the reasons why the annual planning process can feel like groundhog day. I discuss the problems caused by poor personal planning and what this means for your different stakeholders. And I share the three foundations all leaders need to have in place to deliver their plans with the right impact.

Resources and helpful links

If you want to transform your leadership impact book a free consultation call with me

About leaders with impact

Want to know the secret of great leaders? In Leaders with impact we'll be exploring what makes an impactful leader; sharing stories of success and strategies that set them apart.

If you are ambitious for your organisation but are struggling to identify what you can do differently as a leader to deliver the right improvements, then hit subscribe to learn how you can get clear on your strategy, implement some self-leadership and connect with those you serve.

New episodes are released every fortnight.

Get in touch

If you enjoyed the episode please leave a review on Apple podcasts (or your app of choice) and let me know what you thought on LinkedIn or instagram.

I’ll be back with the next episode in two weeks so in the meantime remember to sign up to my newsletter to get notified of new episodes, guest appearances and further insights on how to lead with impact.

Transcripts

Lee Griffith:

How are your leaders approaching the new

Lee Griffith:

financial year? Are they taking a hit and hope approach but like

Lee Griffith:

I play pool, or do they have a carefully considered plan with

Lee Griffith:

clear line of sight back to organizational strategy. I'm Lee

Lee Griffith:

Griffith, communication strategist, executive coach and

Lee Griffith:

all around champion of leaders who shun the old school

Lee Griffith:

stereotypes. I'm here to help you get clear on your strategy,

Lee Griffith:

implement some self leadership, and connect with those who serve

Lee Griffith:

through your communications. If you want to focus on the impact

Lee Griffith:

you're having as leader looking for a free consultation call

Lee Griffith:

with me, where we'll explore how you can fine tune your

Lee Griffith:

performance in order to deliver improved organizational results,

Lee Griffith:

visit Sundayskies.com. For details. In this episode, I'm

Lee Griffith:

exploring the challenges organizations can face when

Lee Griffith:

leaders can't align personal and organizational priorities. I

Lee Griffith:

share the reasons why the annual planning process can feel like

Lee Griffith:

Groundhog Day, I discussed the problems caused by poor personal

Lee Griffith:

planning and what this means your different stakeholders. And

Lee Griffith:

I share the free foundations all leaders need to have in place to

Lee Griffith:

deliver with the right impact. Enjoy. Today, I want to talk

Lee Griffith:

about how leaders plan for the year ahead. You might be saying

Lee Griffith:

it's April, why are we talking about this now, Lee, but a lot

Lee Griffith:

of organizations in the UK at least especially in the public

Lee Griffith:

sector, where I do a lot of work, have financial years that

Lee Griffith:

run from April to March. So we're starting a new financial

Lee Griffith:

year is a new operational Year, New Year for appraisals,

Lee Griffith:

training cycles. PDPs, all that jazz. It's a big old reset for

Lee Griffith:

an organization. And I'm gonna be honest with you, I quite like

Lee Griffith:

the fact that this happens in April. Firstly, who wants to be

Lee Griffith:

doing end of year accounts a new year planning in the run up to

Lee Griffith:

Christmas? You could only imagine the state of

Lee Griffith:

organizational plans once someone's had a few baby showers

Lee Griffith:

at the works party. And I bet you those plans would be way

Lee Griffith:

more fun. But you know who wants to juggle returns with gift

Lee Griffith:

wrapping. And sorry for those whose reality that actually is I

Lee Griffith:

do apologize and I do feel for you. Secondly, I see January

Lee Griffith:

March as like the warm up act for the year. We test a few

Lee Griffith:

those intentions, New Year's resolutions, whatever you call,

Lee Griffith:

see what lands see what doesn't land. We fully embrace a

Lee Griffith:

hibernation mode as winter takes hold. And then we emerge with

Lee Griffith:

the spring balloons in April ready to take on the air. And

Lee Griffith:

one of the things I've noticed over the years when I've worked

Lee Griffith:

in corporate and now talking to clients and friends and family,

Lee Griffith:

we get to this new financial year and suddenly go oh, what

Lee Griffith:

are we going to do? Let's be honest, the plumbing cycle is

Lee Griffith:

usually in our sake, excuse my French. It's like a weird game

Lee Griffith:

of Monopoly where you don't have the rules, the bank is a bit hit

Lee Griffith:

and miss. And you're just randomly throwing the dice

Lee Griffith:

hoping that you hit the right number. Now technically, it

Lee Griffith:

shouldn't be so hard because most organizations have spent

Lee Griffith:

loads of time and loads of energy developing an

Lee Griffith:

organizational strategy. That's the document that's going to

Lee Griffith:

transform your organization over the next 235 years. In theory,

Lee Griffith:

your annual plan is a year's delivery of that strategy at

Lee Griffith:

whatever stage of it you're in. But then organizations don't

Lee Griffith:

take into account the left field guidance or the changes to the

Lee Griffith:

external operating environment that has very little regard or

Lee Griffith:

knowledge of your strategy. They don't think of the internal

Lee Griffith:

shifts that have been happening over the past year past two

Lee Griffith:

years, which your strategy perhaps needs to reflect on and

Lee Griffith:

adapt to. And the third issue is the senior leadership team not

Lee Griffith:

having the time the space or sometimes the skills to

Lee Griffith:

translate the strategy into meaningful action. This is one

Lee Griffith:

of the biggest mistakes I see at this time of the year. And it's

Lee Griffith:

why I want to tackle it in this episode. Because whilst are it

Lee Griffith:

to say they have clarity around organizational strategy, maybe

Lee Griffith:

there has a plan on the page that's gone up around the

Lee Griffith:

organization. If we toilet doors got it, perhaps there's the

Lee Griffith:

headlines or straplines that are trotted out in all central

Lee Griffith:

communications and people can recite it whenever they're

Lee Griffith:

called upon to do. You might have all of that in place. But

Lee Griffith:

then what you find is there's normally a lack of clarity in

Lee Griffith:

the detail that sits beneath it. That translation of strategy

Lee Griffith:

into delivery through the lens of individual director

Lee Griffith:

contributions and so often This is because individual directors

Lee Griffith:

don't have a clear vision for themselves around what their

Lee Griffith:

teams need to do to deliver organizational strategy. And

Lee Griffith:

they struggle to connect back with the wider objectives and

Lee Griffith:

targets. And instead, they focus their annual plans around

Lee Griffith:

personal projects are priorities, which they magically

Lee Griffith:

might link to the organizational strategy. But in the main, they

Lee Griffith:

don't really allow in, and they're not pushing the

Lee Griffith:

organization at the pace that's required. And this causes big

Lee Griffith:

problems for organizations which I see time and time again. So

Lee Griffith:

directors and by default, their teams become overloaded with

Lee Griffith:

priorities with projects competing with organizational

Lee Griffith:

demands. Instead of providing clarity and providing a laser

Lee Griffith:

like focus on the few things that can be done well, and will

Lee Griffith:

deliver the big ask, you find that they don't have the

Lee Griffith:

resources that they're going to need to deliver that ask because

Lee Griffith:

they haven't properly considered and cost the work. And so it's

Lee Griffith:

too late down the line before they realize that a key priority

Lee Griffith:

isn't going to be delivered on time or budget, because it's

Lee Griffith:

never been worked through. And confusion starts to appear

Lee Griffith:

because there's leaders, they can't clearly and confidently

Lee Griffith:

communicate and manage people's expectations for the year ahead.

Lee Griffith:

What you find is with a combination of these problems, a

Lee Griffith:

knock on effect is created, which makes it much harder to

Lee Griffith:

recover from. If we think about it from different stakeholders

Lee Griffith:

point of view. If your executive team or individuals within it

Lee Griffith:

don't have that clarity to connect their priorities with

Lee Griffith:

organizational strategy, then the board isn't going to be

Lee Griffith:

bought in or they're not going to understand how the big

Lee Griffith:

organizational priorities are being met, which leads to

Lee Griffith:

challenging conversations, extra scrutiny, and a whole load more

Lee Griffith:

work to satisfy them. That instantly increases the pressure

Lee Griffith:

felt for Chief Exec downwards and can create quite a hostile

Lee Griffith:

environment in formal and informal board meetings, even

Lee Griffith:

got the team or the teams who report into that or those

Lee Griffith:

directors, they aren't going to be aligned in the actions that

Lee Griffith:

they should be taking. And you'll find that they're either

Lee Griffith:

focusing on the wrong things or feeling overwhelmed with too

Lee Griffith:

many confusing and conflicting demands. That builds resentment.

Lee Griffith:

It erodes trust in the executive team, and it has a ripple effect

Lee Griffith:

down into the organization. As they pass that pressure and pain

Lee Griffith:

on if you look at it from a system partners point of view,

Lee Griffith:

particularly in sectors where you need to work collaboratively

Lee Griffith:

with neighboring or complementary organizations,

Lee Griffith:

because you've got common aims and goals to serve a particular

Lee Griffith:

group or population of people, these partners

Lee Griffith:

will feel frustrated that work isn't joined up and that your

Lee Griffith:

organization isn't committed or focused enough. And that means

Lee Griffith:

you as an organization might get extra scrutiny or less support

Lee Griffith:

for the things that you need them for. And then as a peer

Lee Griffith:

group, if execs aren't clear in their personal vision and

Lee Griffith:

strategy and can't align it with organizational direction, then

Lee Griffith:

as an exec team, it's really hard to do that peer challenge,

Lee Griffith:

hold each other to account, you start to get me thinking instead

Lee Griffith:

of Team thinking, especially when it comes to self

Lee Griffith:

preservation with the board who are being more challenging of

Lee Griffith:

y'all. I had a conversation recently with a new director,

Lee Griffith:

who I'm going to call Dave, for the purposes of this podcast.

Lee Griffith:

And Dave felt he was failing in his role because he was

Lee Griffith:

struggling to get the board off his back about what was being

Lee Griffith:

done this year to improve performance and move them as an

Lee Griffith:

organization into the top percentile, which was a big

Lee Griffith:

strategic goal for them all. Dave also felt like he couldn't

Lee Griffith:

rely on his team. They weren't delivering. And he was having to

Lee Griffith:

do lots of hand holding instead of focusing on the big issues

Lee Griffith:

that only he could sort out which, ironically, if he was

Lee Griffith:

able to do would eventually help move the dial. So internal

Lee Griffith:

pressures from the board, chaos and confusion amongst the team,

Lee Griffith:

a lack of support from the rest of the Exec. He was feeling it

Lee Griffith:

from all sides to the extent that Dave was even taking all

Lee Griffith:

this pressure home with him. He was working late into the

Lee Griffith:

evening missing spending time with his family, not sleeping

Lee Griffith:

because the to do list was ever present. And he was waking up

Lee Griffith:

with things that you had to do emails he had send, which then

Lee Griffith:

didn't create the right conditions when he Get back into

Lee Griffith:

work the next day tired, irritated, frustrated, you see

Lee Griffith:

where I'm going with this? In the conversations I have with

Lee Griffith:

leaders around delivering organizational priorities,

Lee Griffith:

they'll often admit to not having a clear personal plan.

Lee Griffith:

Technically, yes, they've submitted something that looks

Lee Griffith:

like a plan. But it's probably as useful as an inflatable

Lee Griffith:

dartboard, because they haven't got the foundations in place.

Lee Griffith:

They don't have a clear vision or strategy for their area or

Lee Griffith:

areas of responsibility, which is aligned to deliver an

Lee Griffith:

organizational strategy. They don't have the right conditions

Lee Griffith:

of self leadership in place. They don't know what or how to

Lee Griffith:

manage themselves. And they haven't had the right

Lee Griffith:

conversations with colleagues and partners, and so don't

Lee Griffith:

understand the interdependencies at play and how that will impact

Lee Griffith:

on things. Now, you'd be forgiven for thinking that, as

Lee Griffith:

execs they have one job to do, which is to strategically lead

Lee Griffith:

the organization, and they're being paid big bucks to do that.

Lee Griffith:

So how on earth do we get into this annual planning malarkey?

Lee Griffith:

That goes so wrong for organizations? And how do they

Lee Griffith:

repeat these issues year on year, but actually, it's quite

Lee Griffith:

easy to see how this can happen. So think about it, how many

Lee Griffith:

directors that you know have been appointed primarily for

Lee Griffith:

their expert knowledge and skills. Yet, they're great at

Lee Griffith:

finance, HR, operations, whatever it might be, they've

Lee Griffith:

come up through that professional route with a very

Lee Griffith:

narrow focus. And, you know, that has absolutely allowed them

Lee Griffith:

to fly. They've been promoted and promoted because of those

Lee Griffith:

specialists knowledge and skills that they have. But it doesn't

Lee Griffith:

necessarily prepare them to represent a whole organization,

Lee Griffith:

which suddenly opens up like an umbrella. You've probably heard

Lee Griffith:

me say before, definitely, if you listen to the how to lead

Lee Griffith:

podcast, that exec recruitment still seems to value the

Lee Griffith:

specialist over the generalist. There's very few who test how

Lee Griffith:

someone is going to represent an organization, if they can

Lee Griffith:

translate organizational strategy. For example, I've been

Lee Griffith:

on stakeholder panels before recruiting execs and people have

Lee Griffith:

struggled with questions around how they'll take people with

Lee Griffith:

them. And yet they've still been hired because their specialist

Lee Griffith:

knowledge was exemplary. And I'm not going to tell you how those

Lee Griffith:

situations ended up. Nor would I start a conversation here about

Lee Griffith:

this being the reason why the same old faces are recruited

Lee Griffith:

time and time again, that isn't the time of lace, that might be

Lee Griffith:

another episode. And then we have my bugbear of the so called

Lee Griffith:

soft skills. And I have to say it like that, because I resent

Lee Griffith:

and detest that phrase. But I can't think of a suitable

Lee Griffith:

alternative. That doesn't sound like corporate BS. But I'm

Lee Griffith:

talking about relationship building communications,

Lee Griffith:

empathy, influence, being able to earn trust and build

Lee Griffith:

connection to mobilize hundreds, if not 1000s of people. It's not

Lee Griffith:

something you get taught in director induction. I mean, is

Lee Griffith:

there even a thing is Director induction? Or do people just do

Lee Griffith:

a whole load of meet and greets, again, another topic perhaps, is

Lee Griffith:

really vulnerable for someone to admit that they don't know how

Lee Griffith:

to do this stuff, especially when the weight of expectation

Lee Griffith:

is on new directors like Dave. And so these issues never really

Lee Griffith:

get tackled. They never learned the people skills, they're

Lee Griffith:

allowed to maintain more of a specialist focus instead of

Lee Griffith:

representing the organization as a whole. That gets dumped with

Lee Griffith:

the strategy with the Chief Exec. And it becomes this

Lee Griffith:

vicious cycle, where new directors become the old hats

Lee Griffith:

who have to show the way for others who joined the team. What

Lee Griffith:

are they actually teach in them? Bad practice perpetuates.

Lee Griffith:

Organizations need to look at how they're supporting and

Lee Griffith:

onboarding new execs and leaders through the lens of delivering

Lee Griffith:

their vision and strategy. But leaders need to take personal

Lee Griffith:

responsibility as well. And I'd say In summary, you always need

Lee Griffith:

to be reflecting, am I clear and providing clarity to others on

Lee Griffith:

how my personal strategy is delivering organizational

Lee Griffith:

priorities? Have I created the right conditions to lead well?

Lee Griffith:

And is my communications and engagement approach a helping or

Lee Griffith:

hindering hand at what I'm trying to achieve? These are the

Lee Griffith:

three foundations to impactful leadership, and will make the

Lee Griffith:

difference between success and failure. And without these

Lee Griffith:

foundations in place, it's really hard for leaders to take

Lee Griffith:

organizational priorities and strategy and translate it, to

Lee Griffith:

take their teams with them to understand how to focus on the

Lee Griffith:

things that matter most instead of pet projects. I'm pleased to

Lee Griffith:

report that Dave did the work. He booked on one to one

Lee Griffith:

intensive strategy day with me and followed up with some

Lee Griffith:

coaching. And bringing awareness to the challenges he was facing.

Lee Griffith:

He started to get this fresh clarity around his priorities,

Lee Griffith:

new messaging to communicate those with his board and his

Lee Griffith:

team, and a plan of action he could take forward that would

Lee Griffith:

enable him to show up at work and home in a way that didn't

Lee Griffith:

compromise who he was. I spoken to many leaders who feel stuck

Lee Griffith:

in situations like Dave's. And as I say, at this time of year,

Lee Griffith:

it can feel particularly hard to do that reset if the pressure is

Lee Griffith:

on to deliver plans when you can't see the wood for the

Lee Griffith:

trees. If it's something you're seen as a problem in your

Lee Griffith:

organization, let's have a chat about how I can support you.

Lee Griffith:

Visit Sundayskies.com to get in touch. If you enjoyed the

Lee Griffith:

episode, please leave a review on Apple podcasts and let me

Lee Griffith:

know what you thought on LinkedIn. You can find me at Lee

Lee Griffith:

Griffith. I'll be back with the next episode in two weeks time.

Lee Griffith:

So in the meantime, sign up to my newsletter at Sundayskies.com

Lee Griffith:

for monthly insights on how else you can lead with impact. Until

Lee Griffith:

next time.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube